On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote: Am 20.06.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Job: Hi Andreas, I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full. So new record, when will be pg_bulkloaded, will replace "marked-free" location? exactly, that's the task for vacuumI believe that free space is only available to UPDATE, not INSERT.
Am 20.06.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Job: Hi Andreas, I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full. So new record, when will be pg_bulkloaded, will replace "marked-free" location? exactly, that's the task for vacuum
Hi Andreas, I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full. So new record, when will be pg_bulkloaded, will replace "marked-free" location?
I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full.
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
