Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Sharma
Subject Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id CAE9k0Pn_FpewF+88eh2BCzzVxdAhEn+GcdYwwVCqpw_SbEuCyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 4:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 4:26 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hou-san's suggestion to update the common syncrep parser logic for the
> > second patch is not included for now. I'll wait to hear from Amit and
> > others before deciding whether to incorporate it.
> >
>
> The idea was to keep it as a 0003 patch atop 0002. That will help to
> evaluate both your and Hou-San's approaches.
>
> --

Sure. Attached is the 0003 patch, based on Hou-San's suggestion, which
refactors the syncrep parser to explicitly represent bare standby
lists (i.e. those without the ANY or FIRST keyword). I've also
attached the two preceding patches for completeness.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications
Next
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications