Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Sharma
Subject Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Date
Msg-id CAE9k0PmZPG5FRdN92BGDuAc0Rqny+WPtO5aRv3KO_hUv4Sjuwg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mar 27, 2017 22:25, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>>
>> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>
> Thanks, this version looks good to me.

Committed.

Thank you.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning