Hi,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 9:04 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I see your point. I agree that using wal_receiver_status_interval for
> this test may not be a reliable way. Can we attempt using
> pg_wal_replay_pause() on standby and then checking
> wait_event=WaitForStandbyConfirmation with backend_type=walsender on
> primary? Or do you see any issues in this approach that I might be
> overlooking?
>
Yes, I think we can make use of the WAL replay pause/resume mechanism.
This seems like the right approach, as it gives us a more controlled
and deterministic way to validate the lagging behavior.
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.