Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Sharma
Subject Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id CAE9k0PkXu_jy=tPKcFOd+P223Y327T91beF8bV75pUm01evnOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 9:04 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I see your point. I agree that using wal_receiver_status_interval for
> this test may not be a reliable way. Can we attempt using
> pg_wal_replay_pause() on standby and then checking
> wait_event=WaitForStandbyConfirmation with backend_type=walsender on
> primary? Or do you see any issues in this approach that I might be
> overlooking?
>

Yes, I think we can make use of the WAL replay pause/resume mechanism.
This seems like the right approach, as it gives us a more controlled
and deterministic way to validate the lagging behavior.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: DOCS: typo on CLUSTER page
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding locks statistics