Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Sharma
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Date
Msg-id CAE9k0P=uYJV+3UZoA3opsgU_g7ENL63_0uTmCUyefhDAPBFbvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> I think it's OK to check hash_bitmap_info() or any other functions
>> with different page types at least once.
>>
>> [1]- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZUjrVy52TUU3b_Q5L6jcrt7w5R4qFwMXdeCuKQBmYWqQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Sure, I just don't know if we need to test them 4 or 5 times.  But I
> think this is good enough for now - it's not like this code is written
> in stone once committed.
>
> So, committed.  Wow, I wish every patch had this many reviewers.
>

Thanks Robert and Thank you to all the experts for showing their
interest towards this project.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Radix tree for character conversion