Re: Restructured Shared Buffer Hash Table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexandre Felipe
Subject Re: Restructured Shared Buffer Hash Table
Date
Msg-id CAE8JnxNGtaKUs9ZqkcPhWcEJ1RFfGZHJOAqXiqTGQzCe5gv97g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Restructured Shared Buffer Hash Table  (Alexandre Felipe <o.alexandre.felipe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 4:58 PM Alexandre Felipe <o.alexandre.felipe@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 4:13 PM Dhruv Aron <dhruv.aron@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Just logged into commitfest for the first time, perhaps that's why.
Can you try again?

Created, it will be good to see how it behaves in different environments.


All during the same test (recovery/027_stream_regress) that I pointed out above to
be the best to detect issues. Coincidence or not it passed on MacOS (the environment
I tested locally).

Am I being naive with my hopes to make this partially lock-free?
Is there any proof that such an algorithm doesn't exist for this particular problem?

Kind regards,
Alexandre

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Release replication slot on error in SQL-callable slot functions