Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzx1vgw1egmdmHHogKK57W67H3QYTb+tBP4G7Y3TkCRqdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> But now I'm wondering what does this mean for existing indexes? Doesn't this
> effectively mean those are unlikely to give meaningful responses (in the old
> or new semantics)?

The patches shouldn't cause any change to the indexable operators.
The fixes are mostly around the lines and the line segments which
doesn't have index support.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to apartitioned table on foreign server
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018