Re: [HACKERS] close_ps, NULLs, and DirectFunctionCall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: [HACKERS] close_ps, NULLs, and DirectFunctionCall
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzwGWRNARdn1MprQwRGbWv_3sGk9Du2-peDyM1f4ujVN_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] close_ps, NULLs, and DirectFunctionCall  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Does this need fixing, and if so how?

My improve geometric types patch [1] fixes this issue, by cosidering
NaNs larger than any non-NAN same as the float types.  There are many
issues with the geometric types similar to this.  Let's combine our
efforts to put them into a shape.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAE2gYzxF7-5djV6-cEvqQu-fNsnt=EqbOURx7ZDg+Vv6ZMTWbg@mail.gmail.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Page Scan Mode in Hash Index
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.