Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vladimir Rusinov
Subject Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
Date
Msg-id CAE1wr-xLgzJ46CqW64Y9LdhYuq11QWJHWzV1+U0QFgmPb67ikw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com> wrote:
> I guess it would make sense to do all of it in 10.0.
> I'm new here, so not very sure about process. How many commit fests could I
> expect before 10.0 is out (I'm a bit busy at the moment)?

There are two remaining: 2017-01 and 2017-03: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/

Sweet, that's plenty of time.
Consider me signed up, probably by 2017-02 or 2017-03. If somebody else wants to send some patches in this field earlier, please let me know so we don't duplicate the work.
 
> I'd rather have html redirects set up (assuming they are technically
> possible).

That makes the most sense, and that would need some coordination with
the main documentation website to map a new page with the ones from
the previous versions.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] monitoring.sgml - clarify length of query text displayed in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013