I don't think the idea was to rename just one "xlog" function to "wal".
Others will follow later in separate patches. Or is it preferred to have one huge patch submitted?
Personally, I think this is not important, but if you want to do it, I'd follow the suggestion in the thread to rename all functions and leave the old names as aliases or wrappers of some kind.
I think I agree with Michael Paquier: "Better to do breakages in a single release rather than spreading them across releases.".
There's going to be a lot of broken scripts following pg_xlog rename, so I think it makes sense to just drop functions as well. We don't maintain pg_xlog -> pg_wal symlink, do we?
-- Vladimir Rusinov Storage SRE, Google Ireland
Google Ireland Ltd.,Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland Registered in Dublin, Ireland Registration Number: 368047
From:
Ian Jackson Date: Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraintviolation [and 2 more messages] [and 1 more messages]
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.