Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Liming Hu
Subject Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Date
Msg-id CAE-MfPumsY8fELsPOLU18=7vgQDgF6mm5aDTFoOHaCYKUTpsSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Actually it is easy for me to just modify the code, and use it for me
case, I would like to contribute to the
community. I will write a basic implementation first.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Liming Hu escribió:
>>> Hi Atri,
>>>
>>> I also talked to the author of fuzzystrmatch, he also thinks it is a
>>> good feature.
>>
>> Yeah, I heard our fuzzystrmatch module being talked down a decade ago
>> for not considering transpositions, so +1 for getting it patched.
>>
>
> That is awesome then. The example Liming provided is itself pretty
> interesting and promising.
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant



--
Liming Hu
cell: (435)-512-4190
Seattle Washington



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Atri Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: counting algorithm for incremental matview maintenance