Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mihail Nikalayeu
Subject Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command
Date
Msg-id CADzfLwWTFNEDV9vAgLm=dGVi3kBb_p925U1YYG_pX3ty6W6LaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command
List pgsql-hackers
Hello!

нд, 9 ліс 2025, 23:34 карыстальнік Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> напісаў:
It is already possible to achieve that, isn't it?  One can define
side-by-side twice INJECTION_POINT(), then assign a different callback
to each with a strict control of the execution order.

Yes, possible. But the idea is to avoid weird two INJECTION_POINT in a row...

Hm, random idea - make INJECTION_POINT to actually define few injection points: pre-x, x, post-x.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?