<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Tom Lane <span
dir="ltr"><<ahref="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us" target="_blank">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">CoreyHuinker <<a href="mailto:corey.huinker@gmail.com">corey.huinker@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br /> >
In9.4, I encountered a complaint about flex 2.6.0. After a little research<br /> > it seems that a fix for that made
itinto versions 9.3+, but not 9.4.<br /><br /></span>Er ... what? See 1ba874505.<br /><br />
regards,tom lane<br /></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Maybe git fetch might didn't pick up that
change.Odd that it did pick it up on all other REL_* branches. Feel free to disregard that file.</div><div
class="gmail_extra"><br/></div><div class="gmail_extra">I re-ran git pulls from my committed local branches to the
correspondingREL9_x_STABLE branch, and encountered no conflicts, so the 0001.dblink.* patches should still be
good.</div><divclass="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
