On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> writes: > Could we have another output type called "separated" that uses the existing > --fieldsep / --recordsep?
Uh, what's the difference from the existing unaligned format?
No footer and I guess we'd want to escape instances of fieldsep and recordsep in the data, so I guess if we had an option to escape instances of fieldsep/recordsep found in the data, unaligned would work fine.
