Re: use of SPI by postgresImportForeignStatistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Corey Huinker
Subject Re: use of SPI by postgresImportForeignStatistics
Date
Msg-id CADkLM=dr5bfB8YN-bV1U0NDvyVO7a6uuz0BsAi89a1Md4A==8g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: use of SPI by postgresImportForeignStatistics  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: use of SPI by postgresImportForeignStatistics
List pgsql-hackers

IMO I don't think we need to go that far, because 1) the new functions
are provided for FDW authors only, and 2) we don't make changes to the
stats that often.

That would be simpler, to be sure. However, in the past I've received pushback on functions that had a large number of parameters, and this would definitely be a large number of parameters, approximately 17, so I thought I should at least offer the variadic way.

I'm proceeding with the many-parameters model.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: [oauth] Increased CPU usage during device flow with libcurl 8.20.0
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Direction for test frameworks: Perl TAP vs. Python/pytest