I wrote: > So for clarity's sake: first suitable format among these: > Time: 59.999 ms > Time: 121.999 ms (2:01.999) > Time: 10921.999 ms (3:02:01.999) > Time: 356521.999 ms (4 3:02:01.999)Sorry, that probably added no clarity at all, I was confusing seconds with milliseconds in the example values :-( regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных