Re: streaming replication, "frozen snapshot backup on it" and missing relfile (postgres 9.2.3 on xfs + LVM) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Benedikt Grundmann
Subject Re: streaming replication, "frozen snapshot backup on it" and missing relfile (postgres 9.2.3 on xfs + LVM)
Date
Msg-id CADbMkNOYQEK4hLBixptF_oG9DU=wuQs1iAaiodCpnhXwfSQOow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: streaming replication, "frozen snapshot backup on it" and missing relfile (postgres 9.2.3 on xfs + LVM)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: streaming replication, "frozen snapshot backup on it" and missing relfile (postgres 9.2.3 on xfs + LVM)  (Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundmann@janestreet.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr">That's one possible explanation.  It's worth noting that we haven't seen this before moving to streaming
repfirst and we have been using that method for a long time.<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><br /><div
class="gmail_quote">OnTue, May 14, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:hlinnakangas@vmware.com"target="_blank">hlinnakangas@vmware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 14.05.2013
16:48,Benedikt Grundmann wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">It's on the production database and the streaming replica.  But not on the<br /> snapshot.<br
/></blockquote><br/></div> So, the LVM snapshot didn't work correctly?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br
/><br/> - Heikki<br /></font></span></blockquote></div><br /></div> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ryan Kelly
Date:
Subject: Re: psql sets up cancel handler very early
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL 9.3 Beta 1 Liberado