Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol
Date
Msg-id CADUqk8W0QZuMxfYn+vpmGUHAeHh9PUdBnOQkbNiS=1jFipgiTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol  (Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>)
Responses Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol  (Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> wrote:
The following is a request for discussion and comments, not a refined proposal accompanied by a working patch.

After implementing this three different ways inside the backend over the years, I landed on almost this identical approach for handling the MySQL, TDS, MongoDB, and Oracle protocols for NEXTGRES.

Initially, each was implemented as an background worker extension which had to handle its own networking, passing the fd off to new protocol-specific connections, etc. This worked, but duplicate a good amount of logic. It would be great to have a standard, loadable, way to add support for a new protocol.

--
Jonah H. Harris

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens