On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Radim Kolar <hsn@filez.com> wrote:
>
> "It should not be that difficult to get it fixed. I am not interested in
> workarounds"
>
> is pretty dismissive of the work you're already getting for free and without
> having contributed to it in any way. If you don't like it, one of your
> options is to do something about it yourself. The PgJDBC driver is open
> source, so rather than just asserting it can't be that difficult, you have
> the opportunity to prove your assertion by producing a patch that fixes your
> problem. Demanding that others spend their time fixing a problem you care
> about is a bit rude.
>
> I offered you an opportunity to improve your product. To improve
> compatibility with JDBC standard and get paid for this. You guys decided
> that it is too difficult and you will wait years for PostgreSQL protocol
> change.
>
>
> If you approach this with a the attitude of "this is causing a problem for
> me and I would love some help fixing it, any suggestions where I should
> start" you will probably get better results.
>
> I already have results I wanted. I had 2000 EUR allocated to it and only 650
> were needed to get it done, its about 150 lines patch and it took 2 days to
> code and test it.
So are you contributing that code to JDBC ?
>
> Let me ask this one: why you do not have JDBC4 Postgresql Driver, Version
> 9.1-902
> in maven repository? Unwilling to devote few minutes to upload it there?
By all means if it is that simple feel free to upload it
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
