On 09.06.26 13:51, Dave Cramer wrote: > Currently we don't say whether the number of parameters is signed or > unsigned. Same with results
Instead of repeating this with every message, we should clarify this in the section "Message Data Types".
I've attached a new patch.
I had always assumed that a type designation like Int16 or Int32 is signed, because of how they look like C types. But on the other hand, the POSIX functions to convert between host and network order only deal with unsigned types. So it's not obvious either way.
It was surprising to me that some of them were unsigned
