Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHKEqqFRPT5PEP682JFV0M=h1OVf4VY6X711QcdgDzuTFQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?  (Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit@tym.im>)
Responses Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
The only thing I disagree with is returning the internal number. 0 means it has not been set.


On 21 October 2016 at 08:12, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit@tym.im> wrote:
How in this case one would enable previous behavior (fetching all)?

Also as for me, 100 is too low. I'd make it 1000 and make configurable from the uri (defaultFetchSize).

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

Пт, 21 жовт. 2016 00:34 користувач Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> пише:
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> * When setFetchSize() is not called, or setFetchSize(0) was called
> getFetchSize() returns 100.
> The actual number of rows fetched is 100.

Sorry, not 100, but the value of defaultRowFetchSize.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Date:
Subject: Re: question regarding connection failover URL postgresql 9.6 (master/slave)
Next
From: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Date:
Subject: Re: question regarding connection failover URL postgresql 9.6 (master/slave)