Even in a pool if you issue a commit then the data should be
committed. Is the connection open in transaction mode ? Are you
executing a commit ?
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:11 PM, mephysto <mephystoonhell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> I will try to explain my scenario: with my application, many users exchange
> message within them. User1 send message to user2 by a web service. This web
> service send message and wait the response from user 2 before end and send
> notice to user1. I can't know how many time is needed for response, so, I
> would to save te state in a table on database to prevent accidental
> disconnection of client from web service.
>
> But I found that, if transaction are not closed until web service operation
> end, my table are not update, and I can't know the wait state of user1 and I
> can't take back he to his request.
> Moreover, if transaction lock my table, and other user, user3, send a
> message to user4, I can't save his state until user1 operation end.
>
> Is it clear enough?
>
> Is there any wrong in my reasoning? Is there anything I ignore in pool
> functionality?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Mephysto
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgres-JDBC-WS-and-commit-tp5697657p5698263.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
