Re: performance regression with 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: performance regression with 9.2
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJrqgJ+U8GNCokHZPXcnMAq76zrwnVzb8omRNy=h2v-ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance regression with 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Tom,

Will try to get one ASAP.

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca



On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> This query is a couple orders of magnitude slower the first result is
> 9.2.1, the second 9.1

Hm, the planner's evidently doing the wrong thing inside the recursive
union, but not obvious why.  Can you extract a self-contained test case?

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: performance regression with 9.2
Next
From: Willem Leenen
Date:
Subject: Re: performance regression with 9.2