Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJa5+Yz2Mm-H9acex4K+qZofe=dQcZp-ERZnpdFHmQEkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)  (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
List pgsql-jdbc
9.3.1201 which was still built using ant


On 7 January 2016 at 13:53, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thursday 07 of January 2016 13:35:13 Dave Cramer wrote:
> When was the driver last upgraded ?
>
> debian has 1201 which was built with ant.

9.3-1201 or 9.4.1201?  Fedora has 9.4-1200, per [1].  I would be
interested how Debian solved the packaging issues.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196445

Pavel

> Dave Cramer
>
> davec@postgresintl.com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
> On 7 January 2016 at 12:24, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 07 of January 2016 12:10:04 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > Before this change we used ant, plus a number of plugins. Which would
> > have
> > > had to have been built from source. Is this somehow different ?
> > >
> > > Dave Cramer
> > > davec@postgresintl.com
> >
> > This problem existed before (with ant) too.  Due to that, we haven't
> > updated postgresql-jdbc package very-very long ago, so haven't Debian
> > AFAIK.
> >
> > I don't complain! :) Your work is very appreciated.  But unfortunately, we
> > are not able to distribute your software ATM and we are trying to change
> > that.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> >


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Raiskup
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Next
From: Pavel Kajaba
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)