On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 10:15, Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net> wrote:
I see -- we could try that, though we're mostly using an ORM (Hibernate) to do this. Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com> wrote:
пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 16:35, Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net>: > > Hi, > > we're fetching binary data from pg_largeobject table. The data is not very large, but we ended up storing it there. If I'm copying the data to a file from the psql console, then it takes X time (e.g. a second), fetching it through the JDBC driver takes at least 10x more. We don't see this difference between JDBC and 'native' performance for anything except largeobjects (and bytea columns, for the record). > > Does anyone have any advice about whether this can be tuned or what the cause is? I don't know what a reason of that, but I think it's reasonable and quite simple to call lo_import()/lo_export() via JNI.
Can't imagine that's any faster. The driver simply implements the protocol
Do you have any code to share ? Any other information ?
Is the JDBC connection significantly further away network wise ?
