On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 17.05.2012 20:00, Mikko Tiihonen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been thinking of adding connection fail-over support to the jdbc
>> driver. What this means is that there would be a way to specify more
>> than host:port pair to connect to. This will become handy with
>> high-availability installations.
>>
>> Currently the limitation of hostname means that there has to be a
>> virtual ip address that is moved with the active backend, which is a
>> complex solution that can break.
>>
>> If we have list of hostname:port pairs we just have to make sure that
>> only the master database allows connections from the jdbc clients.
>
>
> I'd suggest doing this as a generic wrapper or proxy that would work with
> any JDBC driver, not just PostgreSQL's. Maybe there is such a thing out
> there already? I believe many application servers at least can do that, and
> then there's http://ha-jdbc.sourceforge.net/, which I think can do that too.
>
I would agree with Heikki here that it makes more sense to have a
wrapper. I noticed that ha-jdbc has an lpgl license. How important is
it to have a bsd like license ?
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
