On Aug 25, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:There are newer versions out there!Dave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 25 August 2017 at 19:53, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:On 08/25/2017 05:34 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:The JDBC driver release is divorced from the server release. ThanksDave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 23 August 2017 at 19:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Yes, so I've learned. I just ran my software using jdbc 9.4.1212 via j00Q 3.9 against pg10-beta3 without a problem. I do very vanilla stuff. Yes. I'll get there as needed but wanted to know if any piece needed changing NOW
There are newer versions out there!Dave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 25 August 2017 at 19:53, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:On 08/25/2017 05:34 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:The JDBC driver release is divorced from the server release. ThanksDave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 23 August 2017 at 19:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Yes, so I've learned. I just ran my software using jdbc 9.4.1212 via j00Q 3.9 against pg10-beta3 without a problem. I do very vanilla stuff.
On 08/25/2017 05:34 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:The JDBC driver release is divorced from the server release. ThanksDave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 23 August 2017 at 19:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Yes, so I've learned. I just ran my software using jdbc 9.4.1212 via j00Q 3.9 against pg10-beta3 without a problem. I do very vanilla stuff.
The JDBC driver release is divorced from the server release. ThanksDave Cramerdavec@postgresintl.comwww.postgresintl.comOn 23 August 2017 at 19:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I see no mention of a new jdbc driver on the release notes for Beta 1. Does that mean there isn't one? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных