Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+MLV9JfFGZy2F_NNTBBpCZUpTM7tq+m7B4Wi=hSQr+OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)  (Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On 19 May 2015 at 13:15, Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com> wrote:
A Google search suggests Oracle 9.x supports a unary '?' operator (fuzzy match), so the use of '?' in an operator name is not without precedent.

Interesting argument. There is considerable precedent where we take the position that just because xyz supports it we don't.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Blackwell
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: a few thoughts on the schedule