Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+LK=PSttwsdSAgFoWpkybK-y7SadQ+KnB02XWeYpdNEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download  (Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>)
Responses Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
List pgsql-www

Dave Cramer

On 26 April 2016 at 10:21, Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com> wrote:

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:


> On 25 Apr 2016, at 20:05, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> -WWW,
>
> In reviewing:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKq0gv+Gc0i8j=ktQSkMkLJmmTqUHAm=Eza7zLv+MdXCB6H+Bw@mail.gmail.com
>
> It becomes clear that they are following the Open Source way in a more transparent fashion that the other universal packages available.

In what way exactly? I can't even find the source code on the website. The existing installers are on git.postgresql.org.

Looks like an oversight, we're opening up the repo now. 

The other thing to be very careful of is confusing users. Are these distributions interchangeable? What happens if a user tries to upgrade one with the other?

  That's the beauty of our update manager, It's consistent across platforms and makes updates a snap.  That being said, our testing includes using each set of binaries against data directories created with different installers.
 
Are you building PL/R ? This is particularly problematic for windows as it requires the same version of R to be on the host system as what was used to build it.

Dave

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download