Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From J Smith
Subject Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3
Date
Msg-id CADFUPgfqPiazOauuM7M-qfwA5SWqwQ9mHevRB5kh0A1Lm8-w=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>
> Did you also upgrade to PostGIS 2.x as part of this..?  Seems like it'd
> be unrelated, but one never knows.  Any chance you could distill this
> down into a small test case which exhibits the problem?  I'm guessing
> 'no', but figured I'd ask anyway..
>

Yeah, we upgraded to PostGIS 2.1 as part of the upgrade. In the case
of the specific database that is exhibiting the problem, we only
really use PostGIS for storage and don't do a lot of spatial querying,
as this database is basically for an aggregation service we run. In
the case of the transactions that appear to be causing the problems,
we don't even use geometry fields at all.

Cheers



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.6
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?