Re: My first patch! (to \df output) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Phil Sorber
Subject Re: My first patch! (to \df output)
Date
Msg-id CADAkt-ja_FBFr3nJO8ou-8_X41rV=XQ1P13DqiSa0CDoOLPq1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: My first patch! (to \df output)  (Jon Erdman <postgresql@thewickedtribe.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr"><p>On Jan 19, 2013 10:55 AM, "Jon Erdman" <<a href="mailto:postgresql@thewickedtribe.net"
target="_blank">postgresql@thewickedtribe.net</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > I did realize that since I
movedit to + the doc should change, but I didn't address that. I'll get on it this weekend.<br /> ><br /> > As
faras the column name and displayed values go, they're taken from the CREATE FUNCTION syntax, and were recommended by
Magnus,Bruce, and Fetter, who were all sitting next to me day after <a href="http://pgconf.eu"
target="_blank">pgconf.eu</a>Prague. I personally have no strong feelings either way, I just want to be able to see the
infowithout having to directly query pg_proc. Whatever you all agree on is fine by me.<p>Sounds like you have a +4/-1
onthe names then. I'd keep them as is.</div> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Passing connection string to pg_basebackup