Patch missing from back branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haroon
Subject Patch missing from back branches
Date
Msg-id CAD=LzWFg+Z-KUS3Wm8-1J2vOuYErJXbjuE6b7quzswQEBXJWMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Patch missing from back branches  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Apparently the following patch[1]  got committed to head only (9.6 at the time) and never made it into back branches i.e. 9.5, 9.4 and 9.3. Is it an oversight ?

[1] http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/868628e4fd44d75987d6c099ac63613cc5417629


Regards,
Haroon
--
Haroon                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables arenot supported
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch missing from back branches