On 17.03.24 11:33, Christophe Pettus wrote: >> On Mar 17, 2024, at 02:44, Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote: >> >> Nailed it. PS_USE_NONE fixes it. > > Given the musl (still?) does not define a preprocessor macro specific to it, is there a way of improving the test in pg_status.c to catch this case? It seems wrong that the current test passes a case that doesn't actually work. >