Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI
Date
Msg-id CAD5tBcJAz4EGMLi+uJcJ7pZtT0vwJ_=uU_ATJn39x9GFePW6ZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 7:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 3:33 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the patch, but a big +1 for the idea. Not only this
> might cut down on the resource costs of running the tests in CI, as

It would be good to keep some context between the threads here.  For
the archives' sake, here is where the potential savings were reported,
and this and other ideas were discussed:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJoEO33K%3DZynsH%3DxkiEyfBMZjOoqBK%2BgouBdTGW2-woig%40mail.gmail.com

Yeah thanks for adding that context.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql, new check for extra_errors - strict_expr_check