Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDgH5mC-qWqQTMOWTuHAZTFfB+YuyF7m_zyrcR2T5q3Uw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 3:01 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 7:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:34 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > While looking at this issue again, I realized there seems to be two > > problems with subscription stats on shmem stats: > > > > Firstly, we call pgstat_create_subscription() when creating a > > subscription but the subscription stats are reported by apply workers. > > And pgstat_create_subscription() just calls > > pgstat_create_transactional(): > > > > void > > pgstat_create_subscription(Oid subid) > > { > > pgstat_create_transactional(PGSTAT_KIND_SUBSCRIPTION, > > InvalidOid, subid); > > } > > > > I guess calling pgstat_create_subscription() is not necessary for the > > current usage. On the other hand, if we create the subscription stats > > there we can resolve the issue Melanie reported in this thread. > > > > It won't create the stats entry in the shared hash table, so the > behavior should be the same as without shared stats. Yes, my point is that it may be misleading that the subscription stats are created when a subscription is created. The initial behavior is technically the same for pg_stat_database. That is, we don't create the stats entry for them when creating the object. But we don’t call pgstat_create_transactional when creating a database (we don’t have a function like pgstat_create_database()) whereas we do for subscription stats. On the other hand, I'm not sure we agreed that the behavior that Melanie reported is not a problem. The user might get confused since the subscription stats works differently than other stats when a reset. Previously, the primary reason why I hesitated to create the subscription stats when creating a subscription is that CREATE SUBSCRIPTION (with create_slot = false) can be rolled back. But with the shmem stats, we can easily resolve it by using pgstat_create_transactional(). > > > The second problem is that the following code in DropSubscription() > > should be updated: > > > > /* > > * Tell the cumulative stats system that the subscription is getting > > * dropped. We can safely report dropping the subscription statistics here > > * if the subscription is associated with a replication slot since we > > * cannot run DROP SUBSCRIPTION inside a transaction block. Subscription > > * statistics will be removed later by (auto)vacuum either if it's not > > * associated with a replication slot or if the message for dropping the > > * subscription gets lost. > > */ > > if (slotname) > > pgstat_drop_subscription(subid); > > > > I think we can call pgstat_drop_subscription() even if slotname is > > NULL and need to update the comment. > > > > +1. > > > IIUC autovacuum is no longer > > responsible for garbage collection. > > > > Right, this is my understanding as well. Thank you for the confirmation. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
pgsql-hackers by date: