On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-06 16:43:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-10-06 14:10:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:31:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > I am not against backpatching this but OTOH it doesn't appear critical
> > > > enough to block one's work, so not backpatching should be fine.
> > >
> > > We are just talking about the reset timestamp not being set at
> > > when the object is created, right? This does not strike me as
> > > critical, so applying it only on HEAD is fine IMO. A few months ago,
> > > while in beta, I would have been fine with something applied to
> > > REL_15_STABLE. Now that we are in RC, that's not worth taking a risk
> > > in my opinion.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > Amit or Andres, are you planning to double-check and perhaps merge
> > > this patch to take care of the inconsistency?
> >
> > I'll run it through CI and then to master unless somebody pipes up in the
> > meantime.
>
> And pushed. Thanks all!
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
