On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:29 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/15/17 9:50 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>>
>> What about if somebody does manual vacuum and there are no garbage
>> tuples to clean, won't in that case also you want to avoid skipping
>> the lazy_cleanup_index? Another option could be to skip updating the
>> relfrozenxid if we have skipped the index cleanup.
>
>
> This thread has been idle for six days. Please respond and/or post a new
> patch by 2017-03-24 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
> "Returned with Feedback".
>
I've changes the patch so that lazy_cleanup_index is not skipped when
aggressive vacuum. Attached patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
