On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 3:44 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 10:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I figured out that the join with pg_publication works as a filter;
> > non-existence publication names are not passed to the function. If we
> > pass the list of publication names to the new function signature,
> > while we can simplify the patch and avoid a join, we would change the
> > existing function behavior so that it ignores non-existence
> > publications.
> >
> > I've attached the updated patch. The 0001 patch just incorporated the
> > review comments so far, and the 0002 patch is a draft change for the
> > above idea. Since pg_get_publication_tables(VARIADIC text) is not a
> > documented function, I think we can accept small behavior changes. So
> > I'm going to go with this direction.
> >
>
> What behaviour change are you referring to? In general, the direction
> appears right to me.
When passing a non-existent publication name, the current behavior
raises an error while the new behavior does nothing (i.e., the
difference is calling GetPublicationByName() with missing_ok = true or
false).
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
