Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoCDhiH_OLkZWN6ZD38xFEoMzcnBmzpOKjG4StNht7oi+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:39 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 17 Apr 2023, at 04:04, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've attached an updated patch for fixing at_dobalance condition.
>
> I revisited this and pushed it to all supported branches after another round of
> testing and reading.

Thanks!

Can we mark the open item "Can't disable autovacuum cost delay through
storage parameter" as resolved?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often