On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:35 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:32:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > That seems rather OK seen from here. I'll see about getting that
> > applied except if there is an objection of any kind.
>
> Okay, I have looked at that again this morning and I've spotted one
> tiny issue: specifying --progress with --skip-checksums does not
> really make sense.
I thought that too, but I thought it's better to ignore it, instead of
erroring out. For example, we can specify both --disable and
--progress options to pg_checksum commands, but we don't write any
progress information in this case.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
