Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoC-ed4f8mbD=0uR7trFY3Uaue_q2TC6jQNnZK7Ptvi9Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreignservers  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 2:27 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 2/27/18 2:21 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, although I've thought concern in case where we don't consider
>> local xids of un-resolved fdwxact in GetOldestXmin, I could not find
>> problem. Could you share your concern if you have? I'll try to find a
>> possibility based on it.
>
> It appears that this entry should be marked Waiting on Author so I have
> done that.
>
> I also think it may be time to move this patch to the next CF.
>

I agree to move this patch to the next CF.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg