Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBmAK8TZPKOXtz5TqBbFe06XBfp9f9fbfyA9mZDHLq_8Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> writes:
> > I can close this commitfest. But should we mark uncommitted patches as
> > "Moved to next CF" or "Returned with Feedback" beforehand?
>
> Should be moved to next CF, or at least most of them should be.
> (But I doubt anyone wants to try to kill off patches that
> aren't going anywhere right now.)

Agreed. I'll close this commitfest soon. The patches are automatically
marked as "Moved to next CF" by closing the commitfest?

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: A micro-optimisation for ProcSendSignal()
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: fix DECLARE tab completion