Re: Inconsistent LSN format in pg_waldump output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Inconsistent LSN format in pg_waldump output
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBixG10iMuFyYZvpadGsam7jcFx31E6p7eoVWqwpBKtNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 6:46 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all
>
> I've noticed an inconsistency in the LSN format printed by pg_waldump,
> specifically concerning the lsn: and prev fields in the output.
>
>     $ pg_waldump /tmp/pgdata02/pg_wal/00000001000000000000000A 2>/dev/null |grep 'AB10260'
>     rmgr: XLOG        len (rec/tot):    114/   114, tx:          0, lsn: 0/0AB10260, prev 0/0AB10228, desc:
CHECKPOINT_SHUTDOWNredo 0/AB10260; ... 
>                                                                          ^
              ^ 
>
> In the output above, the LSN 0/AB10260 and 0/0AB10260 refer to the same logical
> LSN, but are presented with a different number of leading zeros in the lower
> 32-bit part.
>
> Upon further investigation, I grepped the source code for the format specifier
> used:
>
>     $ grep '%X\/%08X' -rn src/
>     src/bin/pg_waldump/pg_waldump.c:558:    printf("rmgr: %-11s len (rec/tot): %6u/%6u, tx: %10u, lsn: %X/%08X, prev
%X/%08X,", 
>
> This inconsistency, while minor, could be confusing when cross-referencing
> LSNs within pg_waldump's own output or when parsing it programmatically.

Yeah, it seems that this is the only place where we output an LSN in a
mixed style of with and without leading zeros. And when writing an LSN
we typically use the format "%X/%X", so I agree with the proposed
change.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: minimum Meson version