Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Subject | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBg71Q=FC2nmjW_RbS8At6_ohvx=MO=mG+r0O8dfM3MDw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 3:38 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 4:53 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 5:00 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > > <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sawada-san, > > > > > > > I thought we could fix this issue by checking the number of in-use > > > > logical slots while holding ReplicationSlotControlLock and > > > > LogicalDecodingControlLock, but it seems we need to deal with another > > > > race condition too between backends and startup processes at the end > > > > of recovery. > > > > > > > > Currently the backend skips controlling logical decoding status if the > > > > server is in recovery (by checking RecoveryInProgress()), but it's > > > > possible that a backend process tries to drop a logical slot after the > > > > startup process calling UpdateLogicalDecodingStatusEndOfRecovery() and > > > > before accepting writes. > > > > > > Right. I also verified on local and found that > > > ReplicationSlotDropAcquired()->DisableLogicalDecodingIfNecessary() sometimes > > > skips to modify the status because RecoveryInProgress is still false. > > > > > > > In this case, the backend ends up not > > > > disabling logical decoding and it remains enabled. I think we would > > > > somehow need to delay the logical decoding status change in this > > > > period until the recovery completes. > > > > > > My primitive idea was to 1) keep startup acquiring the lock till end of recovery > > > and 2) DisableLogicalDecodingIfNecessary() acquires lock before checking the > > > recovery status, but it could not work well. Not sure but WaitForProcSignalBarrier() > > > stucked if the process acquired LogicalDecodingControlLock lock.... > > > > I think that it's not realistic to keep holding a lwlock until the > > recovery actually completes because we perform a checkpoint after > > that. > > > > In the latest version patch I attached, I introduce a flag on shared > > memory to delay any logical decoding status change until the recovery > > completes. The implementation got more complex than I expected but I > > don't have a better idea. I'm open to other approaches. Also, I > > incorporated all comments I got so far[1][2][3] and updated the > > documentation. > > > > Yes, it is slightly complex, I will put more thoughts into it. That > said, I do have a related scenario in mind concerning the recent fix, > where we might still end up with an incorrect effective_wal_level > after promotion. > > Say primary has 'wal_level'=replica and standby has > 'wal_level'=logical. Since there are no slots on standby > 'effective_wal_level' will still be replica. Now I created a slot both > on primary and standby making 'effective_wal_level'=logical. Now, when > the standby is promoted and the slot is dropped immediately after > UpdateLogicalDecodingStatusEndOfRecovery() releases the lock, we still > expect the effective_wal_level on the promoted standby (now the > primary) to remain logical, since its configured 'wal_level' is > logical and it has become the primary. But I think that may not be the > case because 'DisableLogicalDecodingIfNecessary-->start_logical_decoding_status_change()' > does not consider original wal_level on promoted standby in > retrial-attempt. I feel 'retry' should be above ' wal_level == > WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL' check in below code snippet: > > +static bool > +start_logical_decoding_status_change(bool new_status) > +{ > + /* > + * On the primary with 'logical' WAL level, we can skip logical decoding > + * status change as it's always enabled. On standbys, we need to check the > + * status on shared memory propagated from the primary and might handle > + * status change delay. > + */ > + if (!RecoveryInProgress() && wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL) > + return false; > + > +retry: > + > > Please note that I could not reproduce this scenario because as soon > as I put sleep or injection-point in > UpdateLogicalDecodingStatusEndOfRecovery(), I hit some ProcSignal > Barriers issue i.e. it never completes even when sleep is over. I get > this: 'LOG: still waiting for backend with PID 162838 to accept > ProcSignalBarrier'. Thank you for the comment! I think you're right. That check should be done after 'retry'. WIll incorporate the change in the next version patch. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
pgsql-hackers by date: