Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBdk-yYK=ViesWyZZkf2dpSRE4OnzhB=HMJ9bL9WTKMWw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 12:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 4:46 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 9:10 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 0002 adds the logical decoding status stored in the checkpoint record
> > > to the pg_controldata output, which I found useful while investigating
> > > the above issue.
> >
> > Should this status be exposed also by pg_control_checkpoint()?
>
> Indeed. I'll prepare the patch. Thank you for pointing it out.
>

I've attached the patch. Feedback is very welcome.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: hashjoins vs. Bloom filters (yet again)
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change