Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoArNPsNKYE1b-oURYonUA7Zo-kaq-u661uWcZqTURb48A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:47 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/14/21, 5:06 PM, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The current pg_dump produced a REVOKE ALL ON TABLES FROM
> > regress_dump_test_role but it seems unnecessary. The patch removes it
> > so looks good to me too.
>
> +1
>

I've looked at the patch proposed you proposed. If we can depend on
acldefault() being STRICT (which is legitimate to me), I think we
don't need to build an expression depending on the caller (i.g.,
is_default_acl). If acldefault() were to become not STRICT, we could
detect it by regression tests. What do you think?

> If we are going to proceed with the patch in this thread, I think we
> should also mention in the comment that we are depending on
> acldefault() being STRICT.

I've updated the patch.

>  This patch is quite a bit smaller than
> what I had proposed, but AFAICT it produces the same result.

Yes. I've also confirmed both produce the same result.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17236: Postgres core on pstate->p_multiassign_exprs