On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:03 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sawada-san,
>
> > One solution is to have two expected-output files to cover both cases.
> > We do a similar thing for the plpgsql_cache.sql test case. What do you
> > think?
>
> Personally I don't like the approach because XXX_1.out can be easily missed to be
> updated, but it is not a strong opinion.
I think that we have only a few releases for v13 and there would not
likely be many cases where we need to update _1.out file. But I'm open
to other ideas. Do you prefer removing the test from v13? I'm not sure
that just because it's easy to miss updating a _1.out file is a good
reason to remove tests.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com