On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:47 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate
> > > > > > function update_replication_progress?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, agreed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have
> > > > prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can
> > > > prepare the back-branch patches based on this.
> > >
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. Looks good to me.
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > Improve the back-branch patches according to the discussion.
> >
>
The patches look good to me too.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
