Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAAjhpS71y3xhZ8sAnX9GK4X31-+h-9RroTmMx4fpocSw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 7:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:46 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > Dear hackers, > > > > > We have discussed three different ways to provide GUC for these > > > features. (1) Have separate GUCs like force_server_stream_mode, > > > force_server_serialize_mode, force_client_serialize_mode (we can use > > > different names for these) for each of these; (2) Have two sets of > > > GUCs for server and client. We can have logical_decoding_mode with > > > values as 'stream' and 'serialize' for the server and then > > > logical_apply_serialize = true/false for the client. (3) Have one GUC > > > like logical_replication_mode with values as 'server_stream', > > > 'server_serialize', 'client_serialize'. > > > > I also agreed for adding new GUC parameters (and I have already done partially > > in parallel apply[1]), and basically options 2 made sense for me. But is it OK > > that we can choose "serialize" mode even if subscribers require streaming? > > > > Currently the reorder buffer transactions are serialized on publisher only when > > the there are no streamable transaction. So what happen if the > > logical_decoding_mode = "serialize" but streaming option streaming is on? If we > > break the first one and serialize changes on publisher anyway, it may be not > > suitable for testing the normal operation. > > > > I think the change will be streamed as soon as the next change is > processed even if we serialize based on this option. See > ReorderBufferProcessPartialChange. However, I see your point that when > the streaming option is given, the value 'serialize' for this GUC may > not make much sense. > > > Therefore, I came up with the variant of (2): logical_decoding_mode can be > > "normal" or "immediate". > > > > "normal" is a default value, which is same as current HEAD. Changes are streamed > > or serialized when the buffered size exceeds logical_decoding_work_mem. > > > > When users set to "immediate", the walsenders starts to stream or serialize all > > changes. The choice is depends on the subscription option. > > > > The other possibility to achieve what you are saying is that we allow > a minimum value of logical_decoding_work_mem as 0 which would mean > stream or serialize each change depending on whether the streaming > option is enabled. I think we normally don't allow a minimum value > below a certain threshold for other *_work_mem parameters (like > maintenance_work_mem, work_mem), so we have followed the same here. > And, I think it makes sense from the user's perspective because below > a certain threshold it will just add overhead by either writing small > changes to the disk or by sending those over the network. However, it > can be quite useful for testing/debugging. So, not sure, if we should > restrict setting logical_decoding_work_mem below a certain threshold. > What do you think? I agree with (2), having separate GUCs for publisher side and subscriber side. Also, on the publisher side, Amit's idea, controlling the logical decoding behavior by changing logical_decoding_work_mem, seems like a good idea. But I'm not sure it's a good idea if we lower the minimum value of logical_decoding_work_mem to 0. I agree it's helpful for testing and debugging but setting logical_decoding_work_mem = 0 doesn't benefit users at all, rather brings risks. I prefer the idea Kuroda-san previously proposed; setting logical_decoding_mode = 'immediate' means setting logical_decoding_work_mem = 0. We might not need to have it as an enum parameter since it has only two values, though. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
pgsql-hackers by date: