Re: libpq compression (part 3) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Burroughs
Subject Re: libpq compression (part 3)
Date
Msg-id CACzsqT6n0WNUGAK4R+Pn52+hAKWuinMqEjKnfkYkx9EroMwXeA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq compression (part 3)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: libpq compression (part 3)
List pgsql-hackers
> I wonder if we could use "upstream" and "downstream" to be clearer? Or
> some other terminology?

What about `send` and `receive`?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack overflow issue
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning